Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Samurai Rex.

Grrr and Gretta had just gotten back from Japan.
Stef were enjoying the silk robes that Gretta had gotten her and the wives were drinking green tea.
Grrr and Bob were playing with the katanas that Grrr brought home.
The guys were running around the house looking for things that they could test the blades on.
Grrr and Bob found two old tires and put them on the workbench in Grrr's garage.
"At the count of three ole ape." said Grrr.
Giving their best samurai battle cries the pals brought the swords down on the tough rubber tires.
The keen blades cut through the tires and the THROUGH the table which crashed to the floor with a bang.
"What was that ?" called Stef from the house. "What are you boys doing? " asked Gretta.
Looking at each other with happy grins Bob and Grrr both said "Nothing."



To be continued

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

PC Marxism summed up.

Everything ..all our values are evil, and racist and only our values can be evil and racist, only by letting Progressive commies take control, brainwash us can we be saved. Because the commies are smarter and better.. How do we know this? Why they told us. Wonder how the people in North Korea like being ruled by the commies?

Worth reading if you would understand the goals of PCism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cultural Marxism refers to a school or offshoot of Marxism that conceives of culture as central to the legitimation of oppression, in addition to the economic factors that Karl Marx emphasized.[1]An outgrowth of Western Marxism (especially from Antonio Gramsci and the Frankfurt School) and finding popularity in the 1960s as cultural studies, cultural Marxism argues that what appear as traditional cultural phenomena intrinsic to Western society, for instance the drive for individual acquisition associated with capitalismnationalism, the nuclear familygender roles, race and other forms of cultural identity;[1] are historically recent developments that help to justify and maintain hierarchy. Cultural Marxists use Marxist methods (historical research, the identification of economic interest, the study of the mutually conditioning relations between parts of a social order) to try to understand the complexity of power in contemporary society and to make it possible to criticise what, cultural Marxists propose, appears natural but is in fact ideological.

Explanation of the "Cultural Marxism" theory[edit]

We are, in Marx's terms, "an ensemble of social relations" and we live our lives at the core of the intersection of a number of unequal social relations based on hierarchically interrelated structures which, together, define the historical specificity of the capitalist modes of production and reproduction and underlay their observable manifestations.
 
— Martha E. Gimenez, Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy [2]
According to UCLA professor and critical theorist Douglas Kellner, "Many 20th century Marxian theorists ranging from Georg Lukács,Antonio GramsciErnst BlochWalter Benjamin, and T.W. Adorno to Fredric Jameson and Terry Eagleton employed the Marxian theory to analyze cultural forms in relation to their production, their imbrications with society and history, and their impact and influences on audiences and social life."[3][4] Scholars have employed various types of Marxist social criticism to analyze cultural artifacts.

Frankfurt School and critical theory[edit]

The Frankfurt School is the name usually used to refer to a group of scholars who have been associated at one point or another over several decades with the Institute for Social Research of the University of Frankfurt, including Theodor W. AdornoMax Horkheimer,Ernst BlochWalter BenjaminErich FrommHerbert MarcuseWolfgang Fritz Haug and Jürgen Habermas. In the 1930s the Institute for Social Research was forced out of Germany by the rise of the Nazi Party. In 1933, the Institute left Germany for Geneva. It then moved to New York City in 1934, where it became affiliated with Columbia University. Its journal Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung was accordingly renamed Studies in Philosophy and Social Science. It was at that moment that much of its important work began to emerge, having gained a favorable reception within American and English academia.
Among the key works of the Frankfurt School which applied Marxist categories to the study of culture were Adorno's "On Popular Music," which was written with George Simpson and published in Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences in 1941. Adorno was worried by signs of conformity in contemporary mass society and also at the conversion of individual artistic expression into the mass production of standardised commodities. He argued that popular music was, by design and promotion, "wholly antagonistic to the ideal of individuality in a free, liberal society",[5] Adorno and Horkheimer's "The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception", originally a chapter in Dialectic of Enlightenment (1947), which argued that culture reinforced "the absolute power of capitalism",[6] and "Culture Industry Reconsidered", a 1963 radio lecture by Adorno.[7]
After 1945 a number of these surviving Marxists returned to both West and East Germany. Adorno and Horkheimer returned to Frankfurt in 1953 and reestablished the Institute. In West Germany in the late 1950s and early 1960s, a revived interest in Marxism produced a new generation of Marxists engaged with analyzing matters such as the cultural transformations taking place under Fordist capitalism, the impact of new types of popular music and art on traditional cultures, and maintaining the political integrity of discourse in the public sphere.[8] This renewed interest was exemplified by the journal Das Argument. The tradition of thought associated with the Frankfurt School is Critical Theory.

Birmingham School and cultural studies[edit]

The work of the Frankfurt School and of Marxist thinker Antonio Gramsci was particularly influential in the 1960s, and had a major impact on the development of cultural studies, especially in Britain. As Douglas Kellner writes:
Cultural Marxism was highly influential throughout Europe and the Western world, especially in the 1960s when Marxian thought was at its most prestigious and procreative. Theorists like Roland Barthes and the Tel Quel group in France,Galvano Della VolpeLucio Colletti, and others in Italy, Fredric JamesonTerry Eagleton, and cohort of 1960s cultural radicals in the English-speaking world, and a large number of theorists throughout the globe used cultural Marxism to develop modes of cultural studies that analyzed the production, interpretation, and reception of cultural artifacts within concrete socio-historical conditions that had contested political and ideological effects and uses. One of the most famous and influential forms of cultural studies, initially under the influence of cultural Marxism, emerged within the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies in Birmingham, England within a group often referred to as the Birmingham School.[3]

Use by current Conservatives[edit]

In current politics, the term has also been associated by Conservatives with a set of values that, it is claimed, are in simple contradiction with traditional values of Western society and Christian religion.[9] Undermining these is believed to be the true purpose ofPolitical correctness and Multiculturalism, which are then identified with Cultural Marxism.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b Merquior, J.G. (1986). Western Marxism, University of California Press/Paladin Books, ISBN 0586084541
  2. Jump up^ Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy, by Martha E. Gimenez, Published (2001) in Race, Gender and Class, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 23-33.
  3. Jump up to:a b Douglas Kellner, "Cultural Marxism and Cultural Studies,"http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/culturalmarxism.pdf, circa 2004.
  4. Jump up^ Douglas Kellner, "Herbert Marcuse," Illuminations, University of Texas, http://www.uta.edu/huma/illuminations/kell12.htm.
  5. Jump up^ "On popular music". Originally published in: Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, New York: Institute of Social Research, 1941, IX, 17-48. See Gordon Welty "Theodor Adorno and the Culture Industry" (1984).
  6. Jump up^ Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer "Enlightment as mass deception" Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso, 1979, 120-167 (originally published as: Dialektik der Aufklärung. Amsterdam: Querido, 1947). On-line the University of Groningen website and Marxist Internet Archive. See Gordon Welty "Theodor Adorno and the Culture Industry" (1984).
  7. Jump up^ Lecture in the International Radio University Program over the Hessian Broadcasting System which was published in German in 1967,English translation in New German Critique, 6, Fall 1975, 12-19 (translated by Anson G. Rabinbach). See Gordon Welty "Theodor Adorno and the Culture Industry" (1984).
  8. Jump up^ e.g. Jürgen Habermas (1962 trans 1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society, Polity, Cambridge.
  9. Jump up^ William S. Lind (2008), Who stole our culture?

Further reading[edit]

Our fathers were brave men

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXmljXjwZko

Free speech.

I dont know if Face book is going to censor posts in defence of the American people's rights to keep and bear arms but if they do. They will do it without me.
"Or me." said Grrr